The discourse players on the role of the balance has bias

The role of balance is the dissatisfaction of most players. They feel that the developers cannot always do this. This is also the articles, forums, most talked about topic. So this can be why Tera Gold was in popular. We have our own views on the role.

The problem is that these ideas all have some bias, which is obviously not surprising, is not it? But that developers face unique challenges. The control elements of the Age of Conan game groups to make a series of adjustment, which means that each role will change, I was shocked again because of the feedback. The players there are always many different opinions, but no topic is more contradictory than the role of balance, causing heated discussions. Views adopted by different groups, the X role in change after Y will become the best or the worst content.

Feedback loop: Often developers are always in conjunction with certain groups to maintain close contact and rely on them to give insightful feedback on the change to be made. Or from the testers, or from high-end guild constructive forum for the display panels, or old friends, contacts. Typically these people are able to give an insightful view, change or adjust the views. In the role of balance, it often changes. So Cheap Tera Gold can be so popular.

I have talked to and several games knowledgeable people. They do not always agree with our views, but always able to provide a good positive and negative feedback, but when it comes to the role of balance, they are always somewhat ignorant.

These are I think a knowledgeable person, I usually refer to them given insightful view when it comes to "them" role, they always show some ignorance. This feedback on the role of adjustment is very difficult to draw a conclusion the game state Note: In this case, you have to believe that the developers are able to objectively look at.

You can simply: excellent developers always do not agree with our views, "but in fact not the case. Developers can get a lot of good feedback from the players who game adjustments or additions are based on player feedback, which allows developers to ignore these views will form a certain bias. This problem should be of concern.

We cannot be based on player feedback remain impartial, but in general, this is indeed helpful, we were able to escape from their perspective found where feedback favoritism. Converted to the role of balance, which is the more difficult interpretation.

Forum users usually have a variety of views, but on this topic, they are always very self-contradictory. This is a strange phenomenon. So this can cause many players let alone how the players to Buy Tera Gold in the reasonable way. And this will be a good way to lead players get into the game.